The use of anger management techniques developed by Novaco (1975)
were applied to a prison population and evaluated by m ultiple
assessments to determine the therapeutic impact. I n i t i a l l y , the
theories of aggressive behavior were explored from a biological and
environmental standpoint. Social learning theory, as defined by Bandura
(1977), was selected as the theory upon which the therapeutic
interventions were based. The research of Fink (198C), Schlichter and Horan (1981), and
Gaertner (1983) were cited as precedents upon which this study was
designed. Unlike the previous researchers, who followed Meichenbaum's
v1977) stress inoculation model of treatment, this study focused
s p e c ific a lly on the coping s k ills component of stress inoculation. The
coping s k ills component was divided into tra d itio n a l behavioral
techniques and cognitive based therapies. The former emphasized a
modified assertiveness tra in in g , relaxation therapy, and modeling. The
cognitive component provided instruction in ra tio n a l emotive therapy and
self-instruction. Forty-eight subjects were recruited from a medium security prison
setting for inclusion in the s«-udy. Four treatment c e lls consisting of
the traditional behavioral therapy component, a cognitive treatment
component, a combined treatment, and a waiting l i s t control were
employed in the research design. Treatment, except for the w aiting l i s t
control, followed the format of treatment manuals that outlined an eight
week course of therapy.Subjects were assessed on three measures at pretest and posttest.
These included a s e lf-re p o rt (Buss-Durkee H o s tility Survey), role-played provocations, and an in s titu tio n a l adjustment measure. A 2 x 2 analysi
of variance for gain scores was u t iliz e d to assess the e ffe c t of the
presence or absence of the behavioral and the cognitive components.
The resu lts indicated a s ig n ific a n t therapeutic gain with respect
to the cognitive component on the ro le-p lay provocations. A marginal
positive gain was found on the Buss-Durkee H o s tility Inventory for the
behavioral therapy component. The followup measure of in s titu tio n a l
adjustment evidenced a positive trend that f e l l ju st short
of significance for the cognitive component. Because the treatments
appeared to be e ffe c tiv e in a selective manner, inferences about a
possible correlation of assessment content and therapy impact were made.